Just think that the creator of the internet wants to auction the source code, it is indecent even to think so. I wanted to make an offer, 1 € I can afford, but it would be free from anyone because I do not let myself be submitted by money, nor by governments, nor by politicians, they know it well in Italy. We pick up on my departure and that insane idea of responding to a comment.
On the Independent, I think the English version, one of the usual articles comes out on the killed Palestinian journalist, there is a comment underneath it is evident that it is from an Israeli, only they use that word and it is a derogatory, I cannot post the image , because unfortunately I didn't have time to take it down, I had an urgent job. The comment said in English "They are goyim, this is normal and right". I post the etymology according to the dictionary, you can also go to wikipedia it is the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goy As you can see Goyim or also gentile, which originally means non-Jewish peoples. If we do as with the mathematical equasions and put the etymological translation in its place, the Israeli comment becomes:
"They are foreign peoples, it is normal and right" At this point my response to the comment of the Israelite in pic. tw1. As you can see, I asked the gentleman a question asking him if it was right to kill all those who were not Israelis. It is a question, not a statement. Logically if the word goyim means non-Israeli peoples, as they say, all the others: Americans, Russians, Egyptians, Congolese, English, French, Italians are part of that category.
It's logical, math, you can't go wrong. The second part of the comment only wanted to explain this logical inconsistency of the Israeli comment, the mental illness part is a hypothesis; now imagine a Muslim who says "all those who are not Muslims can be killed", I remember a sentence like that, they say it to ISIS and only them, they are called terrorists, while everyone else is called mentally ill, so if an Israeli says that all who are not Israelites can be killed, I don't understand what the difference is. Wait, the difference is that Muslims are all terrorists all the others are not, especially for whites, blondes and blue eyes. Maybe I should have called him terrorist and not mentally ill, there is no shame in mental illness, today they are cured, most of them and you can live a normal life. I would say that the tweet came off badly, especially because I'm not a native English speaker, of course. I was sent an e-mail saying that my block would last 12 hours or that I could give my explanations or I could go back and delete the comment, to come back I have to give my phone number. Why?
I do not give phone numbers to commercial companies, especially that have servers and hold my personal data (and the phone number is) in foreign states where the laws are too lax and I don't know who they are then turned to. third parties is passed on to third parties of third parties. I made the decision to ask for clarification as it was possible, disputing what happened, which I did in all the other images. Same explanation I gave above. Their response was that the twelve hour block has gone permanent if I don't give my phone number, plus if I try to log out of my account I am not allowed, when I opened the dispute form they were asked to enter the platform for which I was having difficulty and I entered the browser. Although I try and try to log out, the only thing that appears on the browser is the request for the phone number, I also tried to delete the cache of login cookies, but nothing. At this point I wonder who really wants my phone number and for what reason, since by Twitter regulation it is possible to use an email to log in and it is not necessary to give phone numbers, so I don't need to give my number phone to the social network to log back in, something sounds wrong in this whole story, it's not the first time I've been attacked on the social network, because they want to know where I live or my phone number and Twitter if it really finds it inconvenient, it can delete it by itself the incriminated tweet, so much will remain in memory on this blog and in the historical search of the internet and in the library of Al Xandreia, in short.
In Italy, the law prohibits the manipulation of programs (Article 635 of the criminal code, not the civil code) in order to block or prevent access or prevent the correct use of the software, as well as the manipulation for the purpose of obtaining personal data of the user and you are doing just that, you have manipulated the software to obtain my personal data.
I will not give you my phone number, I am fully traceable for legal reasons, I will give my explanations again in court if necessary, I may have been wrong to speak, because not native English is true, you can get confused, but what you are doing is incorrect. I have been insulted several times on your site and each time you have told me that there was nothing and they were not evading any regulations even when it was evident that they were personal attacks aimed at bullying me. The rules apply to everyone, to me and to others as well. I was wrong? I still don't understand what I said wrong, as I only pointed out a logical mistake in a discussion.
heba