To get to this point, however, there are rules to obtain a product of quality.
The first rule is: be creative. Creativity is the salt and the main course of the product you have to sell (regardless of whether it is an industrial or a commercial one); if your product is the same as your competitors will lose 30% of attractiveness. Then the product should have differences with others of the same type, aesthetic (if possible), manufacturing, for electronic products improved technologies different. For this you need to have the best staff available.
The second rule is: having the best primary commodity market: if using bolts or fabrics of aluminum compared to steel my product will have a shorter duration, if I use the bad cotton than cotton my product could be investable, as the tertiary sectors the raw material is due to the medium that gives the service, may be a bus or a car or a computer; if you use a bus run-down, rusty, unaudited tires smooth instead of a bus in perfect mechanical condition, I'm not providing a service of quality. The lack of raw materials of high quality slows productivity by 50% and makes your product less attractive 20%.
The quality has another rule: to have competent staff. The staff must be able to perform the job adequately. Experience the pay adequately, professionalism too. This means that those who have no experience is not productive, skilled and therefore quality?
No, the experience alone is not enough: the intelligence, the will to learn, the intellectual mobility of know how to learn quickly any type of work, of course colleagues must be willing to fully explain. If you hire the right person the work will go fast, secure and high quality will be, regardless of experience. If in your company applies the rigor of envy, of pettiness and tripping among colleagues for fear of losing their jobs your work will have a dubious quality and productivity will be like not to have it.
If I do not have a product quality my company will not be competitive and even productive.
The last rule is quality control: all that is produced must be checked in all process steps. The first control does the same employee, this is followed by the department head or the head office, and so on up to the leadership, for their expertise, the risks of error are greatly reduced. The final checks are two: the quality controller (company employee) and the certification of quality (company outside the company).
As we have seen the quality is very important for the company and it is also very complex, but if you do not seek all the necessary productivity and stability of the company will be at risk.
Rashna